Turn one recording into a fortnight of video you actually publish.
The webinar was watched live by forty people and has not been opened since. This agent finds the passages that stand on their own, cuts and captions them for each platform, and publishes them straight to your accounts once you have approved them.
What the social video agent does
One recording. Ten clips. Published.
Firms already produce the raw material for this and then do nothing with it. A webinar with forty live attendees. A conference talk somebody filmed on a phone. A recorded panel, a podcast appearance, an internal session that turned out to be genuinely good. All of it paid for, all of it sitting in a folder, all of it seen by the smallest audience it will ever reach.
The agent works through the recording and picks the passages that make sense on their own, which is a different task from taking the opening minute. Each one is cut for the platform it is going to, framed and timed accordingly, and captioned against the vocabulary of your sector so the names and technical terms are right. Most of this is watched with the sound off, which makes the captions the content rather than an accessibility afterthought.
Then it publishes. That is the part that decides whether this survives past month two, because the step that kills every version of this work is a person manually uploading the same file to four platforms on a Friday afternoon. Clips go directly to the accounts you nominate through the official posting interfaces, on your own credentials, after you have approved both the clip and the caption.
It sits alongside the other two. The employee advocacy agent puts clips out under the profiles of the people who feature in them, the social engagement agent handles the questions that arrive underneath, and the content agent turns the same session into written material.
Capabilities
What it handles.
Finds the moments worth cutting
A long recording contains a handful of passages that stand on their own and a great deal that does not. The agent identifies the ones that make sense without the surrounding context, which is a different judgement from taking the first minute and hoping.
Cut for each platform, not resized for all of them
Aspect ratio, length, opening seconds and framing differ by platform and a clip that was cropped rather than cut looks it. Each output is produced for where it is going rather than exported once and reshaped.
Captions that get the words right
Most of this is watched with the sound off, so the captions are the content. Automatic transcription mangles names, firms and technical terms exactly where credibility matters, so the vocabulary of your sector and your people is supplied in advance.
Published straight to your accounts
Clips go directly to the accounts you nominate through the official posting interfaces. The step that quietly kills this work is somebody manually uploading the same file to four places, and that step is removed rather than made tidier.
Approval before anything appears
You see the clips and the captions before they publish. A passage that reads well in a transcript can land differently as forty seconds of video, and that is a judgement worth keeping with a person.
Runs on your own connection
Your own application registration and your own credentials, one firm to one deployment. Your accounts are not pooled inside a shared platform, and your recordings stay in your environment.
Who it is for
Built for firms whose best material is already recorded.
Firms sitting on recordings
A webinar watched live by forty people, a conference talk, a recorded panel, a podcast episode. The work is already done and paid for, and it is currently being seen by the smallest audience it will ever have.
Founders who speak well and write reluctantly
Some people are far better on a recording than on a page, and asking them to write is asking for the version of them that will not happen. Recording once and cutting it is the format that fits how they actually work.
Marketing managers of one
Video is the format you are told to prioritise and the one with the highest production cost per piece. Cutting from recordings you already hold is the only version of it that fits inside the hours you have.
Firms watching competitors on video
Adoption among professional firms is still low, which is precisely why reach is currently high. That gap closes, and it closes first for whoever is already publishing when the rest of the sector arrives.
What is included
What you get.
A direct connection to the accounts you nominate, through the official posting interfaces, on your own credentials.
Long recordings cut into short clips chosen for standing on their own rather than for where they sat in the running order.
Each clip produced for the platform it is going to, rather than one export reshaped for all of them.
Captions checked against the names, firms and technical vocabulary of your sector, supplied during the build.
An approval step covering both the clip and the caption before anything publishes.
Your own application registration and credentials, one deployment to one firm, with no pooling of accounts.
How it gets built
How it gets built.
01
Find what you already have
We go through the recordings the firm holds and identify which are usable, which carry confidentiality or consent questions and which are simply too poor to publish from. Most firms find more than they expected and a few things they had forgotten entirely.
02
Agree what makes a clip worth cutting
A clear point made without setup, a question answered directly, a position stated plainly. We define this against passages from your own recordings that you agree are good, which is a far better instruction than a general rule about hooks.
03
Supply the vocabulary
Names of people, firms, regulators, jurisdictions and the technical terms of your sector, given in advance so the captions are right. This is the step that separates video which reads as professional from video that misspells a client name in large type.
04
Connect the accounts and set approval
Connection is made on your own application registration and credentials, one deployment to one firm. Where a platform requires a review before posts become publicly visible we flag the timing before build rather than after. You decide who approves and how quickly.
Why Delancy
Against a recording nobody has opened since the day it aired.
The asset already exists
This is not a video production service and it does not ask you to create anything new. It works on recordings you have already paid for and already own, which is why the cost per published clip is a fraction of producing one.
Published, not exported
Most tools in this space hand you a folder of files, which puts the manual upload to four platforms back on the person who has no time. Connecting directly to the accounts is the difference between a workflow that continues and one that stops in month two.
Real footage, nothing synthetic
The clips are your people saying things they actually said. Nothing is generated, no synthetic presenter is involved and no words are put into anybody's mouth. For a firm selling on credibility that is not a small distinction.
No ongoing dependency
The agent runs on your own credentials and your own application registration, with the price agreed before build. Your accounts and your recordings are not held inside a shared platform you have to keep paying to reach.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common Questions.
FREE ASSESSMENT
Is an AI agent the right shape for this?
Ten questions on the task, the volume and the output you need. You get a diagnosis of whether an agent fits, not a score.
Take the assessmentCount the recordings sitting in a folder nobody opens.
Book a discovery call. Bring one recording and we will show you the clips inside it and where each one would be published.
Book a discovery call →
A recording. A webinar, a recorded talk, a podcast episode, a panel or an internal session you are willing to publish from. Most firms discover they have several years of these sitting in a folder, which is usually where the first month of output comes from.